Two words that are often used interchangeably and thought to be synonymous. Because of the frequency of which I see this, I’ve decided to explain how I differentiate between the two. Now some of you may find this a little extreme, but as far as basic definitions go, it’s true.
I’ll start off first by saying that (in the realm of D/s or BDSM) all slaves are submissives, but not all submissives are slave. What does this mean? Well, first I should elaborate on some elements/characterstics/what have you of submissives as well as some myths.
Submissives
Traits…………………………………………Myths
+Limits -Subs are not owned otherwise they are just slaves
+Basic Control over Situations -Subs are not as “extreme” as slaves
And now for the slaves
Slaves
Traits…………………………………………..Myths
+No Control -Unable to do anything else
+No limits -Insecure
This may be a bit confusing at first glance so I’ll explain.
Submissives enjoy many “freedoms” that slaves do not. For one, subs still remain in basic control of their bodies, how their scenes play out, and lives. A safeword is not an allowance, it is a right and one that can be very necessary. Slaves, on the other hand, forfeit all rights of life to their owners. To me, slavery is giving everything to your owner, mind, body, soul, completely, including your rights. Simple things like dressing, talking, bathing, etc… all become privileges bestowed onto the slave by his or her owner and can be revoked at any moment. A slave may have had limits as a sub, but in giving up all rights to his or her owner, the safewords, limits, and control went with it. Now any good owner will not abuse this power over their slave, and most likely many owners would allow their slave to keep a safe word, but if slavery progresses as it should (form a D/s relationship to an M/s relationship) the use of a safe word should (ideally) not be necessary as the Dominant/Master would be able to read his or her slaves body language. However, safe words can be very important. But I want to stress the follow:
The decision to transition into slavery should never be taken lightly by either party in the relationship.
Now to elaborate on some of the myths.
Myth 1) “Subs are not owned, otherwise they would be slaves”
-This is blatantly incorrect. Subs can have owners, but this type of ownership differs from that of slavery. In a Dominant/submissive ownership situation it is a declaration of that particular owner having primary authoritative rights over that particular submissive. It does not mean that the submissive has essentially given up all his or her rights to the owner, but rather that he or she has declared one person (or people) to be above all others when it comes to decisions made regarding the sub.
Myth 2) “Subs are not as “extreme” as slaves”
-Some people tend to think that submissives who choose not to be slaves are in some way less willing to “go the extra mile.” Every time I think of this I laugh. Slavery is not for everyone and it is not something that everyone can or is willing to do. This does not make the person a better or worse sub, or more extreme or less extreme than someone else that may choose to enter into a Master/slave relationship. There are many subs willing to “do more” than most slaves, so the two should never be equated.
Myth 3) “Slaves are only slaves because they are unable to do anything else”
- I see this argument a lot in reference to live-in slaves (i.e. supported entirely by their owner). Well for one, how is that any different than being a housewife? Yet I don’t see anyone dissing housewives as being completely incompetent (as a matter of fact, housewives work their asses off!). However, unfortunately, this myth does stem from a reality. Some women, with no other means of supporting themselves, move in as slaves with people they really don’t know too well or have a pre-established relationship with. (I like to think of this as the mail-order bride version of slavery and I’m very much against it because it rarely works).
Myth 4) “Slave are insecure”
-This stems from people believing that submissives become slaves because they can’t say “no” due to some emotional deficiency that drives them to need to be in a relationship or be used or be physically hurt, etc… Yes, we all know many women and men come into this lifestyle as a result of insecurities, but there are just as many that don’t. Slavery is a conscious decision. If you don’t think it is, then you may need to re-evaluate your reasons for being in this lifestyle. Slaves are not mindless drones that just do whatever they’re told. They have personalities just like any other sub. They are intelligent and fun. The only difference is how they have chosen to express their submission.
I like to look at slavery as the natural progression of a stable D/s relationship after trust has been established coupled with a deep understanding of your partner. This can only be achieved through communication.
In ending I’d like to offer a few times for making the transition into slavery.
1) Make a contract.
-This will help with creating a stable framework for your relationship will change after the transition. Within the contract you can and should include hard limits and anything else you feel needs to be established before rights are ceded to the owner
2) Be patient.
-No one comes into this lifestyle as a slave. Some may find it easier to make the transition and some may not like it at all. Take your time to decide what is best for you. D/s is all about individuality and finding what works, there is no set standard and choosing one path or another will not make you any less or more into this lifestyle
3) Be safe!
-No one can predict the future. If you finally enter into a Master/slave relationship and it turns to blatant and obvious abuse. Then leave! Do not remain because you feel like you will be a bad slave or break your contract. (This may sound like common sense, but love and lust and the lick of a whip can warp our mind sets)
Always remember, no matter what you do SSC. Safe, Sane, Consensual.
ADDED 5/23/09:
I decided to add this bit on to help clarify further. Titles have nothing to do with what I am talking about. If you want to call your sub a slave or your owner ‘Master’ then by all means do so. What I am referring to is what the the relationship actually is as opposed to the titles and names used within it.